After the announcement of the new fee policy Unity studio Massive Monster stated that she would remove his indie jita from the sale Cult of the Lamb from January 1, 2024. Later, the developers called this message a joke.
The authors of the game were surprised that one short post in the ex-twitter was a reason for almost a hundred news specifically about their game. Some publications even wrote that the game has already been deleted. But this does not cancel the protest that Massive Monster I expressed after intention Unity Bring money from developers for the number of games installations.
The developers recalled that they are working on updating for Cult of the Lamb. Soon the studio will share new information. But the news about other games Massive Monster You have to wait. The studio will choose another engine for them and train specialists to work with it.
September 18, 2023 Farm with dancing and cute OOblets will be released on Steam on October 5
September 19, 2023 Bungie allowed the players to "have fun" with the weapon exploit in Destiny 2
Cult of the Lamb
The best comments
How to raise sales with one "joke", visual aid.
Oh, these jokers. Thank you for just promising to delete the game, and not make suicide, like some writers.
By a bypass, the developers changed the terms of the license, prohibiting the use of the previous version of the license on older versions of the engine. Thus, they can dictate requirements for all engine users.
Those who bought now without a https://bettingsitesnogamstop.co.uk/darts/ discount can also joke by issuing a refund, have not passed two weeks yet.
Alexander Polar, for example. Also threats and manipulations increased the sale of his creation.
Earth to him with concrete
There, as I understand it, they had a repository on the Hithabe with "conditions of use". So that developers can always easily and quickly learn about any updating conditions. But a few months before the current events, UNITI removed these conditions from Hithab. And then quietly, without warning anyone, removed from the conditions that part where it was said that users can use the old versions of the engine if they do not like any changes in Tos. And for them the conditions that were in the TOS relating to the version that they used/use will be in. And Unit insists that now everyone is obliged to fulfill new conditions, even if the game was made long before their appearance.
And yes, the legality of this is extremely doubtful. On the other hand, UNITI generally said that they would pay for Gampass Microsoft (well, probably for other subscriptions/distributions of all sorts of sony, ninted, Epica, etc.p. they must also pay). And the MIKs seem to have no agreements with the UNITY at all. It would be interesting to listen to how the unity would justify the T -shirts why they should pay them loot.
They began to prepare a collective lawsuit seemed almost immediately after the announcement of new training camps. Well, and so here the standard problem: the court is mainly the question of who will end faster the money.
Well, again, for most developers as a whole, it’s logical not to twitch right now in the direction of the court – when Unity will require this money, it will be sent and sue, then it is then to understand, recalling such tricks with the rewriting of TOS retroactively.
Listen, but deftly you came up with it. I even had a lot at first! Well done.
Uncle, you can’t do it. I didn’t even have time to try, but there are such "jokes". It seems not on April 1
I probably don’t understand something alone. Explain to the ignorant.
Unity developers came up with a new monetization scheme of their engine. Unity developers do not agree with new conditions, they do not accept them and continue to use the old version of the engine on the old conditions that they have already adopted.
Question: how the Unity developer can force users of their engine to accept new conditions if it was sent by forest.
I will play the devil’s lawyer, but I am not really surprised – the joke is shit, yes, but if you look at what tone the entire twitter of the sheep’s cult, then everything falls into place, because they have no post a jack.
For example, once their twitter climbed into a skirmish with Angry Birds Twitter and gave rise to entertaining memes
What kind of writers?
And what kind of "workarily" is it, it is generally legal? Nobody wants to invite them to the court.
They decided that since Unity can spoil their reputation, then why they cannot? The scale, of course, is not comparable, but no one forcibly revealed their mouths.